February 4th, 2010

Okay, I admit it. I watch the Rachel Maddow show on MSNBC. Considering I’ve had a life-long voting record that leans conservative you might find that strange. Maddow is, unquestioningly, a lefty. I find her take on things refreshing and, more than that, she seems to cut deeper to the truth than almost any other news show anchor or pundit. Sure, her position shows, but the facts she presents stand up to any test you care to give them. I like that.

I listened to, and generally agreed with, the position (talking points?) during the George W. Bush presidency that spoke to patriotism — you don’t criticize a war-time president publicly, you support the troops, etc. How many Democrats were regularly accused, by the Republicans, of lacking patriotism for those very reasons?

I would add to that list: politicians are generally expected to lie during a political campaign but they should turn to the truth when it comes to the business of running the country… certainly when it has to do with national security!

This is a rather long segment but, whether you lean to the right or the left, I encourage you to watch it in it’s entirety.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

0
Posted in Uncategorized |
January 29th, 2010

You know you’ve hit the big time when the major comics lampoon you on TV. Rachel Maddow, news anchor and pundit on MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow Show, has not only carved out a solid place for herself in the talking heads market, she has been honored by an awesome impersonation skillfully played by Tracey Ullman on her show Ullman’s State of the Union which airs Mondays at 10:30 p.m. EST on Showtime, now in its third season.

Ullman also takes a loving swipes at Huffington Post’s Arianna Huffington, Congressman Barney Frank, and CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. Ullman visited Rachel’s show to talk about her impersonations and her new American citizenship.

0
Posted in News and Events, Politics |
January 24th, 2010

netflixSome time ago I wrote about the troubles we were having with our Blockbuster Video by mail account and I thought I should update the reader with what has lead to our current situation.

We continued with Blockbuster, making all the changes in our activities suggested by the supervisor who wrote to us including micro-managing our request list so that only available videos were at the top of the list (a silly requirement as anyone who understands database processing could explain!). We gave them another couple of months to see if things would improve. They didn’t. In fact, they got worse. We sometimes actually went a full week without movies.

Okay, I’m a sucker for punishment but, ultimately, we had enough. We canceled our account and signed up with Net Flix. Wow! We got our first movies in two days. Since signing up we have had all of our new movies the second day after mailing them back, e.g. we mail the movie back on Tuesday, Net Fix acknowledges receipt and mails the new movie from our list on Wednesday, and we receive it on Thursday. It’s never been longer.

We thought this must be some kind of good service given to new accounts but, after several months of the same treatment, it seems like this is S.O.P. Additionally we have been taking advantage of their “free” (no additional cost, really) view-online movies. There are a lot of ‘em and there are some great selections. Often they are the same movies available on the movie chanels on cable.

Between fast turn-around on mailings and the available selection of online movies, we are never without something to watch. At this point we are very happy with Net Flix and recommend them to anyone.

2
Posted in Personal Stuff |
January 24th, 2010

In an article titled Stock Your Kitchen for Diabetes Health by Jeanie Lerche Davis (reviewed by Brunilda Nazario, MD) on the WebMD site the truism “Healthy cooking and snacking means having the right foods on hand” is offered. The article goes on, however, to suggest a variety of foods based on the old (and now known to be incorrect) concept that fat is bad and whole grains are the basis of good health.

Some of the foods suggested are:

* Canned beans: Garbanzo, pinto, black, red kidney, navy beans.
* Whole-grain pasta.
* Grains: Brown rice, barley, oats.
* Cereals: Fiber One, Cheerios, Rice Krispies, Kix.
* Diet, light, low-carb whole-wheat: bread, pancake mix, tortillas.
* Chocolate treats: Cocoa Via Crispy Chocolate Bar; Cocoa Via Chocolate Snack Bars; Cocoa Via Chocolate Blueberry Snack Bar.
* Water-packed tuna, chicken breast, and salmon (canned or pouch).
* Canola and extra-virgin olive oil and cooking sprays.
* Low-salt canned tomatoes, tomato soup, broth-based vegetable soups, V-8 juice, tomato juice, Diet V-8 Splash.
* Orville Redenbacher Smart Pop popcorn (snack-size bags).
* Ritz Chips crackers.
* Reduced-sugar jams, jellies, pancake syrups.

More than half the items on this list are, in my opinion, questionable at best. On the one hand Davis gallantly recommends “low carb” bred while, on the other, she offers brand name products loaded with carbs! Pancake mix and tortillas scare the proverbials out of me. And what’s wrong with soaking dried beans? Far less salt which, though not a problem for diabetics per se, is an issue for high blood pressure and heart disease that may well parallel a diabetic course.

The article goes on to include items for a well-stocked diabetic-friendly refrigerator:

* Fresh fruits: Berries, cherries, oranges, tangerines, peaches, grapefruit, grapes, kiwi, plums, watermelon, peaches, melons.
* Fresh vegetables: Spinach, broccoli, cauliflower, eggplant, cucumber, Romaine lettuce, mushrooms, radishes, snow peas, sugar snap peas, cabbage, carrots, green beans, asparagus, garlic, tomatoes, small sweet potatoes, small russet potatoes, edamame (soy beans).
* Low-fat salad dressings.
* Low-fat dairy: 1% or 2% cheese like Baby Bell or Laughing Cow; string cheese (part-skim mozzarella); fat-free sugar-free yogurt; skim or 1% milk; I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter spray; Butter Buds.
* Fresh lean protein:
o Boneless skinless chicken breast
o Turkey loin
o Ground turkey white meat
o Laura’s Lean 4% fat ground beef
o Pork tenderloin
o Beef: fillet, flank steak
o Eggs
o Salmon
o Tofu
o Meat-substitute/soy products.

This list is considerably better but grapes stand out as one of several high-sugar “natural” products diabetics may need to watch and there is an obvious bias in support of the Ancel Keys doctrine of dietary fat, especially saturated fat, is BAD! We now know that the research that supported his conclusines was, at best, flawed and, at worst, fraud. He fudged and cherry-picked his results and nearly all government, medical, and food-industry positions over the last 30 years have been based on his incorrect conclusions.

New studies, and reviews of old ones, too, are suggesting that dietary fats are not only not bad for you, they are necessary and actually assist in controlling diabetes. Atkins, you win!

As we look farther along the list in the WebMD article we see recommendations for stocking a diabetes-friendly freezer:

* Blueberries, blackberries, strawberries.
* Green Giant Select:
o Broccoli florets
o Broccoli, cauliflower and carrots
o Broccoli, carrots, and water chestnuts
o Sugar snap peas
o Whole green peas
o Spinach
* Birds Eye:
o Pepper stir fry
o Sugar snap stir fry
o Seven vegetable stir fry
o Szechwan vegetables in sesame sauce
o Winter blend vegetables and cheese sauce
* Frozen lean protein: salmon, tuna, tilapia, orange roughy; Louis Rich, Butterball or Jenni-O turkey sausage; egg substitutes.
* Ground flaxseed (sprinkle over fruit, breakfast cereal, yogurt, smoothies, sandwich spreads for extra omega-3 fatty acids).

Berries are good and so are vegetables. Raw, of course, is the better choice but having some choices in the freezer is a must for many of us. The protein list is good but why the brand names? Turkey is, after all, turkey. For those of us on a budget we might just have to settle for utility grade! And egg substitutes? Give me a break. Davis obviously hasn’t read the current literature on real eggs… not the cholesterol bumpers they were once thought to be. Perhaps her company doesn’t sell eggs!

The section Spicing Up a Diabetes-Friendly Spice Rack is interesting, if limited (by imagination or, perhaps, once again brand).

* Spice rubs for meat and seafood.
* Garlic and onion powders, not salts.
* Mrs. Dash; Mr. Dash.

So now you say “not salts” — of course you don’t want extra salt since you loaded us up with canned beans at the top of your list. If you start with raw, fresh or dried, ingredients most of us can actually use salt! And, with all the brand names here I can only lead one to ask, “Company sponsored article?”

WebMD has been considered by many as a great help in an otherwise overly regulated and overly expensive arena of medical services. This single article now makes me suspicious of any content on the stie!

Rev. Stephen B. Henry, PhD., is a website architect, researcher, writer, philosopher, and diabetic.

2
Posted in Personal Stuff |
December 30th, 2009

champagne-party-poppersAs the year, and the decade, is coming to a close, I look back over the last 10 years and see lots of good amidst many problems the world has faced. Life for Lora and I has not been the easiest as we started over with very little, workin our way forward in spite of our situation. Ten years later things are coming together; working out just fine.

We’re looking forward to the coming months, years, and decades together with optimism and understanding. We are offering new web stores through MSMOsites and have re-designed that site from the ground up. The web stores will interface with Main Street Mall Online.

And, you might also notice I’ve moved this blog to a new site — tied in with MSMOsites. Great things are coming!

0
Posted in Personal Stuff |
November 11th, 2009

Not long ago right wingnut John L. Perry posted a column on Newsmax suggesting a military coup to resolve what he calls “the Obama problem” which he sees as left wing radicalization of this country.

Newsmax, seldom afraid to go far out on a limb, seems to have had second thoughts about Perry’s position and pulled the article quickly. Frankly, I’m not sure which is worse, the article itself or the fear and censorship that lead to its removal.

What makes this country work is the diversity of opinion and process that exists here and the unfettered right to speak to either side of an issue. When either side places restrictions upon those freedoms this country is lost. Perhaps we already are!

Here is the full text of the withdrawn article:

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

# Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.

# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.

# They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.

# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.

# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.

# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.

# They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.

0
Posted in Politics |
October 17th, 2009

…and keep an eye on what China is going to do in the coming months!

0
Posted in Business, World Events |
October 8th, 2009

0
Posted in Business, News and Events |
October 7th, 2009

The recent enormous growth in the phenomenon that is social networking, from public member personal information sites like Facebook and MySpace, business linking sites like ecademy and LinkedIn, content sites like Squidoo, blogs, and broadcast sites like Twitter, have made this media a hot number on marketers action lists. But has that same rapid expansion turned the whole thing into just another source of junk content?

Looking at my last 200 received tweets I see mostly blurbs from those who use it as a live diary, “just got up and made coffee — mmmmmm!”, and from those who use automated bot software to post famous quotes on the hour and half hour. In between there are the spammers who want me to sign up for yet another get-rich-quick scheme that they “really are making $thousands without doing anything!” and the social media experts flogging yet another must have tool to make the whole process even easier.

Are there any real gems in there, messages that will be useful to me or might lead me to an information source worth keeping? If there are, they seem lost in the sea of spam.

The growth of the Internet is, perhaps, the single most important factor of our time. It has affected more people in a shorter time than any other major watershed event of the modern era. It has provided the path, the vehicle, the means, for more people to reach out and touch each other, to share, to explore, to develop. But with the wonder of all this has come a price. More disinformation, more bad information, more junk content, more spam, has entered our life than ever before. Sorting through it all becomes a task in itself.

The biggest irony may be, as people strive for top position for their bit of the heap through SEO techniques like article marketing, they add their own volumes of content to the increasing noise level and, thereby, reduce their own chances of success. The resulting proverbial vicious circle is self-feeding, self-generating, constantly growing. Does it end with the Internet being overwhelmed by it’s own content? And is this blog post just another contribution to all that spam?

0
Posted in Personal Stuff |
September 23rd, 2009

I find scam emails almost as bad as spam… perhaps even more so since they are often sent to me by people I know who are on my “white” list and, therefore, not caught by my spam filter!

Most people who send me them usually take me off their list quite quickly as I tend to respond to them with my standard admonishment that goes something like this (dependent on the particular current scam):

These type of emails float around all the time. They may be about scams or money Bill Gates will give you or secret birth cirtificates of presidential candidates. Almost always they are false.

This 90#scam is no different. It isn’t real. At least not for most modern telephones and cellphone. It originated in the days of PBX (Private Brance eXchange) systems used by big businesses, institutions, and governments. It does not affect home phones and never has.

There are two seriously BAD things about these scam emails, though:

1 – they waste a lot of bandwidth. And YOU pay for that. Actually, we all do. Every time you pass along one of these emails you increase the amount of data clogging the Internet and, ultimately, increase the cost of YOUR Internet service.

2 – since most people either don’t know how, or are too lazy, to edit the emails they forward, the email addresses of hundreds, thousands, even millions, of individuals, including YOURS, is passed along in unprotected data transfer. Spam mailers love this. It makes gathering up the addresses of unsuspecting indivduals very easy.

Think about it!

You would think people could… well… THINK. ::sigh::

0
Posted in General, Personal Stuff |